Pages

Saturday, March 31, 2012

Medieval Europe Essay


            There is a lot of controversy about the Crusades, or Holy Wars. The majority of people will agree that they had basically no beneficial results. If anything, they made the Catholic Church and the Pope look immoral in the eyes of the people in the Eastern world. Some of the causes of the Crusades were that the Western World wished to unify Christianity because there was little communication with the Eastern World. In the Eastern World, the Byzantine Empire was receiving threats from the Turks, so they requested help from the Western World. The Pope saw this as an opportunity to unify the two different religions and sent knights to help them. Now the first Crusade begins and results in the Christian Knights conquering Jerusalem, which is the center of controversy in the East and is coveted by just about everyone. During the second Crusade the Muslim army, led by Saladin, takes Jerusalem back from the Christians. The third Crusade resulted in a draw and nothing was accomplished. The Christian knights didn’t even make it to Jerusalem on the fourth Crusade, instead they sacked Constantinople and took it over and looted it. The main purpose of unifying the Christian religion ceased to exist by the fourth Crusade.
            During the Middle-Ages in Europe, the feudal system was the type of government being used. The feudal system is based on the ownership of land, so the more land one owned, the wealthier they were. Peasants are at the base of the economic, social, and political systems of feudalism and without them it would not function properly. The economic set-up of Europe’s feudal system was called the Manor system. Nobles and land barons owned land that the peasants, who were tied to the land, would work. Each property had at least three different fields so that two of the fields could be used to grow crops while the remaining one stayed fallow. Every year they would rotate fields so the soil of one field was not overused.
            The King was the head of the political structure. He was in charge of anybody beneath him and anyone that was of a lower social status was required to pay homage to him. Knights of that time could be compared to policemen because they enforced the law, which was the King’s word. The King was also near the top of the social structure. Below him were the nobles and knights, then the freemen who were Merchants, farmers and Craftsmen. Friars and monks would be on about the same social level as these people. After them came the peasants and serfs who are at the very bottom. The feudal system failed in some communities because they were excommunicated from the church and the people revolted or they were wiped out when the plague struck.
            The Church was probably the most powerful during the Middle-Ages of Europe. It had so much power because just about everyone was extremely religious at the time. God was all the peasants had in their lives and other than that, their lives were miserable. Since the feudal system ran was fueled by the peasant’s labor, the kings and nobles that owned the land had to be sure that the Church remained in their community. If the Church were to be removed, the peasants would revolt and be unmotivated to work because God was all the hope they had. The Pope had the power to interdict a community, which means the Church would be pulled out of it. He could also excommunicate whomever he wished. This gave him immense amounts of power and control.
            It seems as though all the Plague caused was millions of deaths and destroyed Europe, along with the rest of the world, but most people don’t see that it was also beneficial. Ironically, the Plague was the most beneficial to the people it affected the most, the Peasants. Although they experienced the highest mortality rate, they were helped by the Black Death because it opened up new opportunities for them. There was a shortage of laborers and the nobles and land barons didn’t know how to farm the land, so they were forced to turn to sharecropping. Now the peasants could own land and technically were no longer called peasants. Many people who experienced the death of loved ones never really started another family out of fear of losing them again. Since families were not being created, the population recovered very slowly.
            The Church was not really affected by the Plague; therefore, it did not benefit. It was actually at a disadvantage afterward because it turned the sick, suffering people away and closed its doors. People lost respect for the Church but did not lose any faith in God.
            The Manor system was no longer used after the Plague because the peasants weren’t tied to the land anymore. Sharecropping became a major economic foundation in place of the Manor system.
            Ultimately, The Church was greatly affected by all of these circumstances. The mistake of initiating the Crusades distorted the Eastern Worlds view of the Western World and they were also a waste of man power. The devastating consequences of the Plague hurt the Churches image when they closed their doors to the people of Europe. The Church and society were becoming corrupt and debauchery became common, even among priests.

No comments:

Post a Comment